![]() ![]() A focus on knowledge places the justification of policy interventions in relation to the application and development of a society’s state of knowledge. The maxim can also be placed within the framework of Mill’s theory of knowledge. As a consequence, much of the subsequent discussion of the principle has been set within the context of Mill’s contribution to the liberal tradition. Mill enunciated his ‘do no harm’ principle in the context of an analysis of the individual in relation to collective decision-taking by society. 68-69, Penguin Books.Īccording to some commentators it is the apparent simplicity of the principle that accounts for its lasting popularity. ‘ The sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of their number, is self-protection…the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others’. The canonical statement on harm occurs in JS Mill’s Essay ‘On Liberty’ where he sets forward ‘ One very simple principle’. The key regulatory measures in the Action Plan on sustainable finance provide that ‘the precautionary principle of ‘do no significant harm’ is ensured’. A striking contemporary example is provided in the context of the EU’s Action Plan to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. It is held to apply to the decision-making of all actors, from individuals and corporations to governments and their regulators. From its early use in the Hippocratic Oath and medical ethics, its deployment has now extended to other areas including bioethics more broadly, education, the environment and internet ethics. The maxim ‘do no harm’ (DNH) is enjoying a surge in popularity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |